Does ProPlaintiff integrate with Clio or Filevine?

Per ProPlaintiff's own FAQ, it connects to Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive and does not yet support other CMS integrations. CaseDelta drives Clio, Filevine, and MyCase directly, along with your email, drive, and billing.

How does pricing compare?

ProPlaintiff publishes a usage-metered Law Credits model, which can vary with document volume. CaseDelta is a flat $349 per user, per month, so a heavy case does not change your bill.

Is CaseDelta just a ProPlaintiff clone?

They share the agentic, PI-native, chat-driven approach. The concrete differences are deep CMS integration that drives your actual systems, flat per-user pricing instead of usage credits, and multi-agent chronology depth on the largest record sets.

Comparison

CaseDelta vs ProPlaintiff

ProPlaintiff is our nearest mirror: agentic, PI-native, chat-driven, with cited output. So the difference has to be specific. It comes down to integrations, pricing shape, and chronology depth.

CaseDelta is an AI associate that drives a plaintiff firm's case-management and full stack, while ProPlaintiff.ai is an agentic PI tool that connects to cloud storage and produces demands, chronologies, and document analysis. They are close in spirit; the difference is that ProPlaintiff connects only to file storage, and CaseDelta operates the firm's actual case-management systems.

CaseDelta

ProPlaintiff

Integrations

✓Drives Clio, Filevine, MyCase, plus email, drive, and billing

Connects to Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive only

CMS control

✓Operates your case-management system directly

Per its FAQ, does not yet support CMS integrations

Pricing

✓$349 per user, per month. Flat, published, self-serve.

Published, but usage-metered Law Credits that can vary with volume

Chronology depth

✓Multi-agent over 100 to 5,000-plus page sets

Source-linked chronologies from uploaded files

Scope

✓Works the whole case across your stack

Works the files you upload

The integration gap is the whole difference

ProPlaintiff's own FAQ states that it connects to Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive, and does not yet support integrations with other CMS providers. That means its intake-to-settlement claim runs on the files you upload, not on the systems you run. Delta actually drives Clio, Filevine, and MyCase, plus your email, drive, and billing, from one chat. For the nearest mirror, that is the decisive, concrete difference.

Flat per-user, not usage credits

ProPlaintiff publishes its pricing, which we respect, but it is a usage-metered Law Credits model that can get unpredictable as document volume grows. CaseDelta is $349 per user, per month. flat, published, self-serve. A full associate seat, not a meter that ticks up with every heavy case.

Built for the biggest record sets

Both tools produce cited, source-linked chronologies. Delta's multi-agent orchestration is built for the 100 to 5,000-plus page med-mal and mass-tort sets where single-pass generation strains, so the depth holds up on the cases that matter most.

ProPlaintiff is an app you upload files into. Delta is the associate that works inside the tools you already run.

When ProPlaintiff is the better fit

If your case files live entirely in Google Drive, Dropbox, or OneDrive, you do not need deep CMS control, and a usage-credit model suits your volume, ProPlaintiff is a capable, transparent option. CaseDelta is the better fit when you want to drive your actual case-management system and pay a flat, predictable per-user price.

Questions

See Delta inside your firm's stack.

A twenty-minute live demo on a sandbox of your firm's tools, running a real workflow end to end.

Book a demo