Comparison

CaseDelta vs Eve

Eve and CaseDelta use almost the same words: an associate that works your whole case. The difference is direction. Eve wants your firm to move in. Delta lives in the tools you already use and drives them.

Same words, opposite direction

Eve's pitch is that every attorney gets an associate, and that your firm becomes AI-Native by running work inside Eve. Delta's pitch is the inverse: it lives in Clio, Filevine, MyCase, your email, your drive, and your billing, and drives them. One asks you to move in. The other moves in with you. For a firm that already has a stack it likes, that direction is the whole decision.

No page ceiling on the big record sets

Eve consolidates medical records into chronologies, and reviewers on G2 report a per-session document or page limit that can force summarizing or removing files. On a 3,000 to 5,000 page med-mal set, that is a real wall. Delta's multi-agent orchestration has no advertised page ceiling on the largest sets.

A price you can see, and a five-minute connect

Eve is quote-gated, and reviewers describe per-user pricing as high and note a setup learning curve. CaseDelta is $349 per user, per month. flat, published, self-serve. with five-minute self-serve onboarding for any platform that has a public API. Know your price, and be running the same afternoon.

Eve is a place you go to work. Delta is the associate that works inside the tools you already have.

When Eve is the better fit

If your firm wants to commit fully to one vertical platform and rebuild its workflows inside it, and you are comfortable with an enterprise, demo-gated motion, Eve is a well-funded, fast-growing choice with strong intake and drafting. CaseDelta is the better fit when you want to keep the stack you already run and add an associate on top of it.